Earlier this month, the Rural Wi-fi Affiliation stated that T-Cellular and Verizon overstated their protection whereas submitting paperwork to the FCC as a part of its Mobility Fund Section II program. Now T-Cell has responded.
“RWA’s imprecise and irresponsible statements relating to T-Cellular’s MF-II maps are unsupported by any proof and are false,” T-Cellular mentioned in a letter to the FCC. T-Mo went on to say that it adopted procedures and submitted shapefiles to the FCC reflecting its 4G LTE protection as of December 2017, which is in line with the FCC’s directions, and that the provided information usually tend to understate protection as T-Cellular expanded its community by way of the problem course of.
“RWA’s misrepresentations are a part of an ongoing sample of baseless allegations by the group in opposition to T-Cell designed to delay or thwart competitors in rural America and deprive rural People of significant alternative for broadband companies,” T-Mo added. “The group’s repeated disregard for reality-primarily based advocacy is a disrespectful waste of Fee time and sources.” In the meantime, the RWA is sticking to its claims, telling Ars Technica that in velocity checks performed by its members in March using November, T-cells protection isn’t what T-Mo claimed it was in its January submitting.
The FCC has mentioned that it’s launched an investigation into whether or not “some main carriers” violated the MF-II program guidelines and submitted incorrect protection maps. Whereas the FCC hasn’t stated which carriers it’s investigating, some have thought that they might be T-Cell and Verizon since these are the two carriers that had been referred to as out by the RWA. Nevertheless, T-Cellular says that it hasn’t been contacted by the FCC relating to its investigation into the alleged violations of the MF-II program’s guidelines.
The MF-II program is meant to surrender to $4.53 billion in authorities help to carriers to deploy protection in rural areas. The FCC is asking airlines to submit protection maps so that the FCC is aware of which components of the U.S. want wi-fi protection and the place it ought to distribute its cash, which is why it’s necessary for carriers to submit accurate maps and for the FCC to unravel this example. It’s unclear what’ll occur subsequent, however with T-Cellular and the RWA standing agency of their positions; the FCC should type this out.